Help, guidance and information relating to the process of utilising the SRBC grid to provide effective LCH treatment.
(Part 2 of 2) Following the Reinterpretation and Correction in the previous session, this transcript shows the therapist checking to see what information remains to be dealt with before concluding treatment (includes SRBC detailing).
(Part 1 of 2) Reinterpretation of Causative Event (transcript from recording). Using IMR and the TV Visualisation Technique this transcript works through the SRBC to identify the cause and then helps the patient to reinterpret the event and correct the effects.
Through research and experience, one therapist explains how she is now able to ensure Reinterpretation is carried out only on the Causative Event, not a confirmation or trigger incident.
How long should treatment sessions last? Appointments which go on for too long cause complications in treatment and a great deal of pressure on both patient and therapist. This article explains how and why.
Transcript of treatment for skin-picking of lips and fingers, provided by Helen Lesser in front of students on a Practical Course. This is the fourth transcript in the series of 4 and shows the final session and checking procedure.
Transcript of treatment for skin-picking of lips and fingers, provided by Helen Lesser in front of students on a Practical Course. This is the third transcript in the series of 4.
Transcript of treatment provided by therapist Emily Fennell showing the SRBC in practice to locate the Causative Incident and help the patient to reinterpret the event and correct its effects.
A therapist gains guidance from colleagues on LBR/LBW and how to effectively use the information gained from whether words/actions were accepted at the time or instead were reacted to as if true at some later point.
Working with the SRBC grid requires precision, but if all the elements are identified within each stage, the flow from one to the next is smooth and clear. The flow chart shown details the elements which are required in order to establish and understand the full reason.
If a patient consistently provides different reasons for the symptom, how should the treatment proceed? How can one be sure one is working with the priority information?